NewzAlaska’s primary revealed some of the headaches related to a major change in how voters select their candidates JUNEAU, Alaska (AP) — Even after the last votes were counted from Alaska’s primary election, the final slate of candidates was far from settled. Late withdrawals shook up the races for governor, U.S.
House, leaving many voters upset with candidates who dropped out after winning a spot in November’s general election or cursing others who stayed in. Some were quick to blame the upheaval on Alaska’s unique elections system that combines open primaries, where the top four vote-getters advance, with general elections run under a ranked choice system. The August primary revealed some of the headaches related to a major change in how Alaska voters select their candidates and was the latest example of how the real-world experience of state voting changes don’t always line up neatly with expectations.
California Democrats earlier this year worried they might get shut out of the state’s top-two primary for governor out of fears they were running too many candidates. Alaska voters will once again be asked to decide whether to keep or scrap their election method this fall. Maine is the only other state using ranked choice voting for its statewide races.
“We need to make things much more transparent and predictable and understandable by the general public so that we can truly have trust in our democracy again,” said Matt Schultz, a Democrat who suspended his U.S. He plans to support keeping the system in place but said it is a complicated decision. He thinks adjustments can be made and sees the role big money plays in elections as a major factor that discourages candidates.
Decision to drop out after primary disappoints some voters Alaska first used the voter-approved top-four primary and ranked choice general election system four years ago, and two years ago narrowly rejected an effort to repeal it. Supporters have credited the system with having a moderating effect on the Legislature in what has long been a Republican-led state, with both chambers controlled the past two years by bipartisan coalitions. That was one of the intentions when supporters originally placed ranked choice on the ballot, to introduce a voting system that could reduce partisanship by opening a door to more candidates who would need to work beyond their traditional bases for support.
An unintended consequence is what happened after voting ended in thi… House bid before the primary.He plans to support keeping the system in place but said it is a complicated decision.
Summary from source