Home › World

Alex Murdaugh’s defense and prosecutors expect to clash over evidence during pretrial hearing

World 2 sources 2 countries 🔦 Under-reported 49m ago

Prosecutors and lawyers for Alex Murdaugh are scheduled to return to court in South Carolina on Friday amid escalating disputes over evidence for his retrial next year on murder charges. Murdaugh, 58, is scheduled to stand trial again in April on two murder charges in the June 2021 shooting deaths of his wife, Maggie, and younger son, Paul, at their home in Colleton County. He is expected in court Friday as he serves a lengthy prison sentence after pleading guilty to stealing from clients.

The South Carolina Supreme Court overturned the former lawyer’s convictions earlier this year, ruling that a court clerk influenced jurors during his 2023 trial. The clerk told jurors to watch Murdaugh’s body language and not be fooled when he testified in his own defense. Both sides are expected to dispute whether defense DNA experts can test the rest of a sample of genetic material found under the fingernails of Murdaugh’s wife.

They’re also expected to argue over whether authorities must turn over ballistics and other evidence from shootings in eight surrounding counties involving the same type of gun as one of the weapons used in the killings. Very little may be said about the most intriguing dispute of all. Defense lawyers want to know whether prosecutors have called a grand jury to investigate a police officer who was friends with Murdaugh.

Defense attorneys said that prosecutors suggested the officer arrived at Murdaugh’s home before other law enforcement officers and could have helped him hide bloody clothes or the weapons used in the killings. Neither the clothes nor the weapons have been found. Murdaugh’s lawyers said the evidence is critical because prosecutors argued during his first trial that he acted alone.

Prosecutors said no one else was at the home between the killings and Murdaugh’s return from visiting his mother, when he called 911 to report the shootings. The defense says another person’s involvement would cast doubt on testimony from witnesses who said at Murdaugh’s 2023 murder trial that he acted alone. Murdaugh’s lawyers also demanded any evidence prosecutors have of possible accomplices or a grand jury investigation into them.

In response, prosecutors declined to say whether any evidence exists, citing legal restrictions on disclosing whether a grand jury is meeting. Prosecutors and the defense have been getting crankier in their court filings.

Summary from source
Read the full story at the source Toronto Star (Toronto, Canada) · CA ↗
Get the news on TelegramTop stories & under-reported picks, straight to your feed — free. Join →

Covered by 2 sources