Civil service reforms have topped the agendas of Pakistan's political parties since inception. For decades, leaders have championed slogans to reorient the bureaucracy, foster specialisation and restructure the state machinery for peak efficiency. despite endless committees, official reports, foreign consultants and modern buzzwords, good governance is still out of reach.
The International Crisis Group has, in one of its reports, stated that "decades of mismanagement, political manipulation and corruption have rendered Pakistan's civil service incapable of providing effective governance and basic public services." In public perceptions, the country's 2.4 million civil servants are widely seen as unresponsive and corrupt, and bureaucratic procedures cumbersome and exploitative. Bureaucratic dysfunction and low capacity undermine governance, paving the way for democratic subversion and extremist destabilisation. It is, however, also a fact that successive governments committed to initiating reforms driven by encouraging expertise and restructuring the administrative machinery.
Not only did they introduce special pay scales such as P-I and P-II to attract professionals, they also invited experts from world-renowned institutions - MIT, Yale, Stanford, Oxford, Cambridge, etc - to advise on reforms in institutions such as the FBR, police and other services. However, no noticeable change could be seen, and inevitably, the system functioned on the same stereotypical model. The antiquated civil service machinery could not deliver in the past, nor does it have the capacity to deliver in the future, regardless of how many experiments are attempted, unless fundamental changes occur.
Mere cosmetic changes will not fix a system whose structure was designed for an agrarian economy. Administrative cadres - both at the federal and provincial levels - continue to rule the roost. In essence, the generalist Pakistan Administrative Service controls the reins, while specialised cadres remain marginalised.
Although the bureaucracy, under the illusion of reform, coins terms such as e-governance, the Prime Minister's Portal and the Chief Minister's Portal, these gimmicks are only good for optics. While they may provide limited relief to a few, they are superficial. These measures hardly address the deeper structural imbalance.
For specialists, the existing bureaucratic system remai…
Summary from source