In April 1953, Dwight Eisenhower stood before the UN General Assembly and offered the world a bargain. The United States, he said, would share the "peaceful atom" — nuclear reactors, medical isotopes, research training — with any nation willing to accept American oversight of how that knowledge was used. "Atoms for Peace" was sold as generosity.
It built a system in which the United States decided who was permitted to know, who could be trusted with the knowledge once they had it, and who would be cut off the moment they stepped out of line. Pakistan learnt this lesson more intimately than most. The Pressler Amendment, following the Symington Amendment before it; decades of sanctions calibrated to the country's nuclear ambitions, gave Islamabad a masterclass in how the world's most powerful nation treats knowledge as a weapon to be holstered and unholstered at will.
It was leased, with the lessor retaining the right of eviction. Seventy years later, a new peaceful atom has arrived, and the same bargain is being offered again, dressed in the language of chips and clusters instead of uranium and centrifuges. Artificial intelligence has become the substance over which the twenty-first century's great powers are fighting for control, and once more, the Global South is being asked not whether it wants to participate in the future, but on whose terms it will be allowed to.
The contours of this contest sharpened dramatically this July, when the World AI Conference and High-Level Meeting on Global AI Governance convened in Shanghai. For the first time since the event's founding in 2018, President Xi Jinping himself took the stage, using the moment to announce the creation of the World Artificial Intelligence Cooperation Organisation, a body twenty-nine countries have already signed on to as founding members. Xi described it as China's answer "to the call of the Global South," pledging 5,000 training and seminar opportunities for developing nations over the next five years and calling for "a just and equitable system for global AI governance." His premier, Li Qiang, has spent two consecutive WAICs refining the same pitch: AI as a public good rather than private property, and computing power and technical know-how as things to be distributed rather than hoarded.
Contrast this with the vision articul…
Summary from source