NewzThe developer of a proposed downtown data center says he's willing to work with the city on efforts to preserve a historic building at the site. He also defended what the project could bring to KC. From New York to Texas, state and local governments have heard the message: Their constituents are wary of data centers.
Across the political spectrum, large numbers of Americans agree that these facilities should pay taxes, cover the bill for water and power upgrades, keep noise to a minimum, and employ locals at decent wages. In other words, data centers should legitimately benefit the communities whose land and power they use. Developers often express a willingness to do these things—until they see the specific list of requirements.
A pitched battle in the Philadelphia suburbs provides a vivid illustration of this dynamic. Developer Brian O'Neill wants to build a 2 million-square-foot data center in a former steel plant. Under Pennsylvania law, Plymouth Township (in which the plant is located) cannot simply say "no" to any lawful land use, but it can enforce zoning rules and require project mitigations in the name of health and safety.Read full article Comments
Summary from source