Politicians are increasingly abandoning scripted language and publicly cursing as profanity becomes a more common political tool.Why it matters: The shift suggests politicians are using profanity intentionally to project authenticity, signal confrontation and distance themselves from traditional Washington norms.What they're saying: "There's this dissatisfaction and anti-establishment fervor that's been present for probably at least a decade now," Nick Beauchamp, a professor at Northeastern University who studies political rhetoric, tells Axios."I think that part of the appeal of the strong language… is to take some of that same energy that might otherwise be directed towards radical policy, and instead directs it towards a radical rejection of the status quo."Driving the news: President Trump said Wednesday morning that American forces were going to "beat the fucking shit" out of Iranian forces after Iran targeted U.S. Bernie Moreno (R-Ohio) cursed out Anthony Fauci, who led the U.S. COVID-19 response, during a Senate hearing Wednesday, condemning the nation's mask requirements at the height of the pandemic."Here I am sitting in front of you six years later, saying, who the fuck do you think you were for doing that?"By the numbers: Presidents, vice presidents and presidential hopefuls have used profanity at least 692 times in public since 1919, according to data from Cardiff University.And 605 of those instances occurred in just the past 10 years.Trump and former President Biden account for 78% of all recorded profanity.
Biden prefers words such as "damn," whereas Trump has used more colorful language like "fuck," "shit," "bastards" and "shithole."Other politicians who frequently swear include Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.), who wrote "fuck" in at least 77 X posts from 2020 to April 2026, and Rep. Derrick Van Orden (R-Wis.), who used the f-word at least 35 times, according to a New York Times analysis.Zoom in: Voters perceive swear words as significantly more informal, which measurably improves voters' overall impression of a candidate by making them sound like an ordinary person, according to a study published in the Journal of Language and Social Psychology.Cuss-filled rhetoric didn't necessarily persuade more voters, but it did help candidates unconsciously pass the "vibe check," indirectly increasing voter support.Male pol…
Summary from source